My 2 cents worth...

Sunday, July 23, 2006

"It's necessary to be slightly underemployed if you are to do something significant."

"It's necessary to be slightly underemployed if you are to do something significant."
James D. Watson - US geneticist

Friday, January 27, 2006

As Abraham Lincoln said of another moral blight on the nation supported by Democrats: You can "repeal the Declaration of Independence — repeal all past history — you still cannot repeal human nature. It will still be the abundance of man's heart, that slavery extension is wrong; and out of the abundance of his heart, his mouth will continue to speak."

Friday, June 24, 2005

My hole in one

Hole in one


http://www.pga.com/home/pgaofamerica/holeinone/search.cfm?fname=Jason&lname=DiFrancesco&submitform=Search&facility=&month=00&year=00

Friday, April 15, 2005

Rap's Dehumanizing Message

Rap's Dehumanizing Message

Thursday, March 31, 2005

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

NewsMax.com: Inside Cover Story

Monday, March 28, 2005

OpinionJournal - John Fund on the Trail

OpinionJournal - John Fund on the Trail: " a compelling argument that Congress took an extraordinary step when it met in special session to create a procedure whereby the federal courts could decide whether Ms. Schiavo's rights were being violated. He may have a point when he accuses Republicans of 'trying to command judicial activism and dictate outcomes when they don't like' rulings. But where were Mr. Frank and other liberals when the Clinton administration decided to sidestep a federal appeals court and order an armed raid against Elian Gonzalez? While Mr. Frank allowed that the use of assault rifles in the Elian raid was 'excessive' and 'frightening,' he also defended the Justice Department's view that 'of course [agents] had to use force.'"

Thursday, October 28, 2004

WMDs

NewsRadio 1370 WSPD: "The Kay Report says no WMD's will be found, and the CIA is to blame...but the Democrats want to blame the President. Here's a mirror. Look into it. In the interest of national unity and bi-partisan support of our troops in Iraq, I was hoping both sides of the political spectrum would be willing to put aside their differences. Instead, what we have witnessed is the height of hypocrisy on the part of most of the high-ranking members of the Democratic Party. In an interview with Nicholas Ray, Senior Advisor to the Democratic National Committee, Mr. Ray called for an independent investigation in the interest of ensuring that the CIA intelligence is improved in the future. But he also went out of his way to claim that it wasn't all the CIA's fault...and that whatever information the CIA had on WMD's was 'filtered' through the Bush Administration. Well if that's true, it would explain why so many Democrats in the last 3 years have stated publicly that Saddam had the WMD's. But it WOULDN'T explain why the very same Democrats made the very same statements from 1998 through 2000...when the Clintion Administration controlled the White House! Did Clinton also 'filter' information from the CIA to make Democratic leaders claim Saddam had WMD's?!? The fact is that nearly every prominent Democrat in the last five years, since the LATE 1990�s, has publicly agreed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, and the capability to deliver them. This means that if the Bush administration was wrong, and the CIA miscalculated the Iraqi threat, then the Clinton administration was duped as well. Unfortunately, there are always skeptics who always need proof before they will admit that someone in their party may have been hypocritical for partisan political purposes. In chronological order from 1998 to 2003, t"